It's cold under the blanket.
Today I turned eighteen. It has been possibly the most boring, uneventful birthday ever, but I guess every year more of the novelty of birthdays wears off a bit more. I got up, ate cornflakes and revised proof by induction. Two cards, some chocolates, nothing else. I'm not really bothered any more, to be honest. I feel like I've already celebrated. And two weeks before exams is not a brilliant time to go wild. I feel sleepy and peaceful, anyway. I have wonderful CDs to listen to, and plenty of tea to drink. No one else is home: my parents are on holiday, my brother's gone to the pub. The postman brought a parcel, but I slept through the doorbell and didn't wake up until one. Tony Benn was on Any Questions, which was a neat little birthday surprise. Perhaps I'll have an afternoon nap. I'm still in my pyjamas at half past five.
We Are Scientists was a truly great. Fresh and energetic and funny. Lots of moving and trampling though. Ironically the crowd were at their wildest and most violent when the band played 'Nobody Move, Nobody Get Hurt'. The last song they played, just before the desperate stampede to get out was 'The Great Escape'.
I was thinking about Paul Wells' arguments about New Labour today. Paul Wells is an incredibly frustrating person to have an argument with: he is not only notoriously right wing, but also completely reactionary and doesn't appear to support taxes, the Welfare State or civil liberties. In fact he behaves like a member of the 19th century aristocracy. He completely disregards Blair's policies on education, privatisation and private financing and dismisses any suggestion of Blair as a neo-conservative or Thatcherite. More controversially he is under the impression that Hitler was left wing, leading me to the conclusion that he is either a far right propagandist or completely ignorant. Hitler attempted, and almost succeeded in murdering the German left and trade union movement. His policies were not grounded in some kind of left wing economic ideology, but rather in racial superiority, capitalism and fascism. How can Paul Wells label Hitler a socialist when socialism involves the people controlling the means of production? In Nazi Germany the means of production was controlled by private capitalists.
I love Paul. I just hate his politics. Sometimes I get the feeling lots of people think that about me.
Show Your Bones is a wonderful wonderful album and I will listen to it until the cows come home.
x
9 Comments:
Happy Saturday! Didn't get you anything, but my sister baked you a cake, and family is family if you know what I mean. It means, if you don't know what I mean, that I get to claim credit for her present as well. And I will, as I run laughing to the bank and/or patent office.
But would you still ove me if I was a Nazi?
Love, I mean. Love!
fascists need hugs too people, spread the love!
I think you mean spread the ove! I ove you Jackson! I ove everyone!
I'm happy to ignore Wells' views, but he feels the need to impose them on me.
Everyone admire my new YYYs picture!
x
P.S. Just got served in Somerfield: legal drinking, baby! Plus I bought a load of junk food, including Pepsi, Twiglets and Haagen Dazs! This birthday thing just keeps getting better and better...
No ove for you! This ove is mine! MINE! Gaaarhllewarglewoo.
Jackson has stolen all the ove! I'll get you yet you ove stealing nazi-box-person you!
*shakes fist*
I am impervious to Liam, in the same way an elderly person is immune to bullets!
Blog mayhem!!!
"Hitler...acknowledged differences would exist and that was not necessarily bad."
The Holocaust??!?!
"Economic theory does not necessary come in to it" ... ok, so you are looking at Hitler's authoritarianism as separate from his economic policy, fair enough. Then you say that "true private ownership existed but not private control": therefore it was a right wing system, but like everything else in Nazi Germany it was dictated by the state. According to your definition of fascism the economics can be right or left, in this case right. You seem to be confusing Hitler's totalitarian system with a left wing system of prioritising common welfare. Just because something is controlled by the state that doesn't make it left wing. Hitler controlled all aspects of society (taxes, wages, education) because he was a dictator, not because he was some kind of left wing egalitarian. As for healthcare this was part of the war economy, and was a means of achieving world domination, not providing equality. Hitler placed emphasis on merit and 'racial purity', not equality anyway: as shown by his scientific experiments on disabled children. Saying Hitler preached equality is not only disgustingly untrue but also completely disrespectful to those whom he persecuted.
You also seem to suggest that Hitler's policies were collectivist, making him left wing. How can you link Hitler's 'volk' state with collectivisation, when anyone not racially pure was excluded from it?
Also you've yet to reply to my comments on Blair.
I suspect this argument is partly about you defending the right by disassociating it from hated figures like Hitler and Blair.
*End of political rant*
I left my phone in Louise's bag on Thursday, so didn't get your text B*, but thanks anyway...
Ove and kisses (when will that joke grow old?)
xxxxxxxxx
PS Won't your mum realise your number has changed? Kudos for getting a new phone so quickly!
Post a Comment
<< Home